One governed semantic layer over official statistics

Nepal's under-five mortality has fallen 82% since 1990.

17,352 observations · 9 sources · 52 indicators for Nepal, live as of 2026-08-09 20:42 UTC.

Live from this build

Under-five mortality

deaths per 1,000 live births · Nepal, India, Bangladesh, South Asia, China, Japan

25.1 Nepal · 2024
Data table
Year Nepal (deaths per 1,000 live births)India (deaths per 1,000 live births)Bangladesh (deaths per 1,000 live births)South Asia (deaths per 1,000 live births)China (deaths per 1,000 live births)Japan (deaths per 1,000 live births)
1990 138.4127146.5128.653.66.3
1991 131.3123.4140.3124.5536.2
1992 124.3119.9134.1120.652.16.1
1993 117.7116.5127.8116.850.86
1994 111.4113.1121.6113.149.25.9
1995 105.3109.7115.5109.347.45.7
1996 99.5106.2109.4105.545.55.5
1997 94102.7103.3101.743.55.2
1998 88.799.197.197.841.45
1999 83.695.491.293.939.14.7
2000 78.791.885.59036.64.5
2001 74.388.180.286.134.14.3
2002 70.284.675.382.431.44.1
2003 66.581.170.878.928.84
2004 63.177.766.875.626.33.9
2005 6074.36372243.7
2006 57.37159.668.721.93.6
2007 54.767.856.565.520.13.5
2008 52.464.553.662.418.53.4
2009 50.161.251.159.417.13.4
2010 47.958.148.756.315.73.3
2011 45.85546.553.414.63.3
2012 43.75244.450.513.53.1
2013 41.749.142.447.712.53
2014 39.746.440.545.111.62.9
2015 37.843.738.542.610.72.8
2016 3641.336.740.3102.7
2017 34.2393538.19.32.6
2018 32.636.933.5368.62.5
2019 3134.932.334.182.5
2020 29.63331.432.47.52.4
2021 28.331.230.930.872.4
2022 27.129.530.729.36.62.4
2023 26.12830.6286.12.4
2024 25.126.630.526.85.72.4
World Bank

World Bank Open Data (CC BY 4.0)

Dataset
WDI
Snapshot
2026-08-09 · Fresh
Licence
CC-BY-4.0
Cadence
quarterly
As of build 4a6c70c · open data.worldbank.org ↗
Open at World Bank ↗

What the figures say

In Nepal, under-five mortality fell from 138.4 in 1990 to 25.1 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2024 — an 81.9% fall. All 6 series shown fell over the same window: China furthest, by 89.4%, and Japan least, by 61.9%. Nepal sat above India until 1993 and has been below it in every year since 1994.

Computed from the rows above — first and last observation, change, ranking and crossings — not written by a model, so it cannot drift from the data.

The same country's numbers arrive from dozens of institutions in different shapes, on different schedules and under different licences. Groundfact consolidates them into a single queryable model — asked in plain English, with every figure traced back to its source, dataset and snapshot date. Nepal is the first instance; the architecture is country-agnostic.

See all of Nepal's data →

Every question below is answered from the exact-match cache this build already holds — no model call, no waiting, and no figure that was not already true before you arrived.

What is Nepal's under-five mortality rate?

27.1 deaths per 1,000 live births · 2022

World Bank

World Bank Open Data (CC BY 4.0)

Dataset
WDI
Snapshot
2026-08-09 · Fresh
Licence
CC-BY-4.0
Cadence
quarterly
As of build 4a6c70c · open data.worldbank.org ↗
Open at World Bank ↗

Answered from cache — no model call.

How much rice does Nepal produce?

5,955,500 tonnes · 2024

Nepal produced 5,955,500 tonnes of rice in 2024

FAOSTAT

FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (CC BY 4.0)

Dataset
QCL
Snapshot
2026-08-09 · Fresh
Licence
CC-BY-4.0
Cadence
irregular, per-dataset (bulk catalogue re-checked on every refresh; see meta_dataset_status)
As of build 4a6c70c · open www.fao.org ↗
Open at FAOSTAT ↗

Answered from cache — no model call.

What is Nepal's adult literacy rate?

68.7 % · 2019

68.7% of adults aged 15+ could read and write in 2019

World Bank

World Bank Open Data (CC BY 4.0)

Dataset
WDI
Snapshot
2026-08-09 · Fresh
Licence
CC-BY-4.0
Cadence
quarterly
As of build 4a6c70c · open data.worldbank.org ↗
Open at World Bank ↗

Answered from cache — no model call.

How much does Nepal spend on education?

3.69 % · 2024

Nepal spent 3.69% of GDP on education in 2024

World Bank

World Bank Open Data (CC BY 4.0)

Dataset
WDI
Snapshot
2026-08-09 · Fresh
Licence
CC-BY-4.0
Cadence
quarterly
As of build 4a6c70c · open data.worldbank.org ↗
Open at World Bank ↗

Answered from cache — no model call.

Ask your own question →

9 sources, each ingested on its own schedule under its own licence. The counts below are this build's, not a brochure's.

Sources in this build: what each one supplies, how far back it reaches, when Groundfact last refreshed it, and under what licence. A dash under Indicators means the source is loaded into the warehouse but not yet mapped into the semantic layer, so nothing on the site cites it yet.
Source What we take Indicators Coverage Last refreshed Licence
World Bank data.worldbank.org WDI refreshed quarterly 43 434,869 values 1960–2025 260 geographies 2026-08-09 Fresh CC-BY-4.0
UN SDG Global Database unstats.un.org 211 datasets refreshed quarterly 2 13,660 values 1980–2026 1 geography 2026-08-08 Fresh CC-BY-3.0-IGO
International Monetary Fund www.imf.org 5 datasets refreshed quarterly 5 44,477 values 1948–2031 202 geographies 2026-08-09 Fresh attribution
FAOSTAT www.fao.org QCL refreshed irregular 2 3,324 values 1961–2024 26 geographies 2026-08-09 Fresh CC-BY-4.0
ILOSTAT ilostat.ilo.org 10 datasets refreshed weekly 3 64,874 values 2000–2025 12 geographies 2026-08-08 Fresh CC-BY-4.0
UNESCO Institute for Statistics uis.unesco.org UIS refreshed quarterly 7 24,196 values 1970–2025 210 geographies 2026-08-09 Fresh CC-BY-SA-4.0
DHS Program dhsprogram.com 87 datasets refreshed irregular 3 1,059 values 1985–2025 87 geographies 2026-08-09 Fresh DHS-aggregate-attribution
Our World in Data ourworldindata.org 9 datasets refreshed monthly 8 2,640 values 1750–2025 207 geographies 2026-08-09 Fresh CC-BY-4.0
Humanitarian Data Exchange data.humdata.org 4 datasets refreshed monthly 57,384 values loaded 2001–2026 191 geographies 2026-08-09 Fresh per-dataset

When official sources disagree, Groundfact doesn't quietly pick one. It shows both — and the honest reason they differ. Neither source is wrong.

Reconciliation spotlight Two sources, two numbers

Unemployment, total (% of total labor force), NPL, 2008

1.38–10.6 % two sources differ by 9.22 percentage points

Why do these differ?

ILOSTAT's UNE_DEAP_SEX_AGE_RT is the direct labour force survey estimate (total, ages 15+), reported only in the years Nepal ran an NLFS round (1996, 1999, 2003, 2008, 2015, 2017); the World Bank's SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS is a smoothed modelled annual series. The two converge almost exactly in 2017 (verified live: 10.66% both) but ILOSTAT sits far below the Bank's figure before it (1.4-4.5%). That is a real break in Nepal's own survey methodology, not a data error: Nepal's LFS moved from an extended activity definition (which classified most subsistence/unpaid economic activity as employment, pushing measured unemployment very low) to the standard ICLS-19 definition around the 2017/18 NLFS III round.

Lower reading
1.38
ILOSTAT
ILOSTAT

ILOSTAT, International Labour Organization (CC BY 4.0)

Dataset
UNE_DEAP_SEX_AGE_RT_A
Snapshot
2026-08-08 · Fresh
Licence
CC-BY-4.0
Cadence
weekly (Sunday 22:00 Europe/Paris)
As of build 4a6c70c · open ilostat.ilo.org ↗
Open at ILOSTAT ↗
Higher reading
10.6
World Bank
World Bank

World Bank Open Data (CC BY 4.0)

Dataset
WDI
Snapshot
2026-08-09 · Fresh
Licence
CC-BY-4.0
Cadence
quarterly
As of build 4a6c70c · open data.worldbank.org ↗
Open at World Bank ↗
Read the reconciliation note →
  1. Sources

    Official statistics — World Bank, UN agencies, national statistics offices and more — ingested on a schedule, each one licensed and attributed.

  2. Semantic layer

    A curated model reconciles indicator definitions, units and geographies across sources, so "under-five mortality" means one thing everywhere it appears.

  3. Cited answers

    Every figure carries its source, dataset and snapshot date — inline, not in a footnote you have to go looking for.

Read the architecture →